Mediations of First Philosophy by Descartes Essay -- Philosophy Philos

Intercessions of First Philosophy by Descartes In the â€Å"Mediations of First Philosophy† Descartes attempts to demonstrate the presence of God in the third contemplation. He does this by thinking of a few premises that in the long run mean a strong contention. In the first place, I will clarify why Descartes pose the inquiry, does god exist? Furthermore, for what reason does Descartes think he needs such and contention now in the content. Besides, I will clarify, in detail, the contentions that Descartes makes and how he arrives at the resolution that God exists. Next, I will discuss some of Descartes premises that make his contention an unsound one, including round thinking. At long last, I will check whether his unsound contention has reduced and subverted his important objectives and the hopeless establishment of information.      In prior reflections Descartes demonstrated that he existed through the Cogito contention. Descartes should now proceed onward to look at and investigate inquiries regarding his general surroundings, however as opposed to doing this he first stop to analyze the topic of whether God exists. Descartes needs to realize that he was made by an infinitely knowledgeable, flawless maker that is acceptable and needs to ensure that he was not made by a shrewd soul or evil spirit. On the off chance that Descartes can demonstrate that he was made by an ideal all knowing maker then his thoughts must convey some similarity to truth, since God isn't a trickster and he should of set these thoughts in Descartes. Descartes has valid justifications for looking for the response to the subject of God’s presence, presently he needs to concoct a decent solid contention to demonstrate it.      Throughout the â€Å"Meditations on First Philosophy† Descartes gives a few significant contentions about the presences of god, he gives one contention in the third contemplation and on in the fifth reflection. The contention in reflection three and the one we will concentrate on is known as the â€Å"Trademark Argument†. This contention originates from the reality asserted by Descartes that within everybody is a preeminent being, which is set there by whatever made us. From this announcement Descartes can say that an imprint from a God has been place within all of us. This contention includes the affirmation of such a thought is inside ourselves, this thought God is a being who is interminable and boundless and a maker of all things. This is Descartes first reason. His subsequent reason is the â€Å"Causal Adequacy Principle.† The p... ... like Descartes ever has any genuine solid contentions for the presence or God or himself existing or any of his speculations.      In end, Descartes made a contention to demonstrate God’s presence and appeared to have the option to demonstrate that he existed, however after an investigating and revaluating his speculations you see that he utilizes a great deal of roundabout thinking. It is extremely difficult to accept any of what Descartes is stating. In the wake of perusing his reflections you are left befuddled, for the most part since you are attempting to interpret what he is stating and you wind up going around and around due to the roundabout thinking. Indeed, even without the roundabout thinking the contention just doesn’t bode well, particularly in today’s world, with no information. To have the option to comprehend a sound contention for the presence of God just sounds too absurd to even think about believing. To accept that God exists based of confidence and religion is the thing that individuals today and in Descartes time, also, accepted. To state that God exists in light of the fact that there more likely than not been some prevalent maker that put this thought in my mind is extremely implausible. Individuals don’t should be informed that God exists on the grounds that the vast majority as of now accept and the vast majority of them realize that he does.  â â â â

Mr. Posgais Biology Ii Class Lab Essays - Web Colors, Free Essays

Mr. Posgai's Biology Ii Class Lab Essays - Web Colors, Free Essays Mr. Posgai's Biology Ii Class Lab Theoretical Mr. Posgais Biology II class frequently considered the idea of creepy crawlies fascination in specific hues on blossoms. All things considered, on September 14, 1999, we chose to investigation and make sense of which hues on blossoms were increasingly prevailing over others. Our Biology class split into gatherings of two and three individuals. Each bunch took an alternate shaded bit of banner board. One individual in each gathering applied Tangle Trap to the twelve by nine inch zone and stapled each board to a bit of cross section. We at that point took the cross section outside, around fifty feet from the school building and left it outside for around forty-eight hours. At the point when we recovered our cross section, we checked the quantity of creepy crawlies on each board and demonstrated our theory, that bugs lean toward yellow blossoms and white blossoms over different hues, to be valid. Presentation During the seven day stretch of September 13, through September 17, Mr. Posgais Science II class completed a fascinating trial including bugs and their shading attractions. Fertilization is indispensable to bug and bloom propagation. Winged animals and bugs float from blossom to bloom, choosing the fitting kind of their decision to continue their fundamental assignment of nature. With the manner in which nature works, this procedure sounds to be basic; be that as it may, it is substantially more confounded and it could be said, increasingly staggering than you would ever envision. A fledgling or bug flies or strolls up into the bloom to arrive at the dust. As time moves o, that equivalent flying creature or potentially creepy crawly will proceed onward to something different and convey the dust with it. The dust being moved as is this a main consideration in the blossom multiplication framework. My class concocted the speculation that the creepy crawlies would be most pulled in to the shades of yellow and white. Our speculation was end up being valid at the point when we acquired the grid containing the entirety of the individual hued banner board pieces. The outcomes were to be expected to us, as white had assembled eighty three creepy crawlies and yellow social occasion eighty. These hues together nearly are more than the rest of the hues creepy crawly sum consolidated. Materials and Methods - 9 Different shading banner sheets: red, blue, yellow, white, purple, green, dark, orange, and hot pink - Tangle Trap - Putty blade - Pencil - Ruler - Lattice - 2 sticks Everybody in the class initially split into gatherings of three and four individuals. Each gathering picked a 14 by 11 bit of banner leading body of an alternate shading. They took the ruler and separated with the pencil, roughly a one inch fringe for dealing with. With the clay blade within reach, they applied the Tangle Trap to the center of the board, being mindful so as not to let it jump on their hands or attire. Dealing with the bit of banner board by the one inch verge on the sides, each gathering painstakingly took their board and stapled it to the cross section. The cross section was then positioned outside (being held up by the two sticks) with every one of the nine distinctive hued banner sheets stapled on it, with each piece having a 12 by 9 accessible catching space. After about forty-eight hours, they recovered the grid and each gathering reclaimed their appointed shading and checked the quantity of bugs on it. Conversation/Conclusion In the wake of recovering our grid board from outside, and cautiously tallying over what's more, finished, for consolation, the aggregate sum of creepy crawlies on each bit of banner board, what's more, the various sorts, our class reached the last resolution that yellow, white, what's more, red were the more prevailing hues in this specific analysis. Despite the fact that, this didn't actually coordinate our theory, the outcomes were close. Likewise, you should take in to thought when perusing this end we just made one preliminary. During a typical investigation, there ought to be mutiple test. Afterall, if is difficult to decide the realities of nature with numerous investigations, not to mention only one. There could likewise be numerous different components which influenced our outcomes. An model would be that not every person determined precisely a one inch outskirt from the sides of their banner board. A few people may have put the Tangle Trap on their board thicker than others, which would prompt pretty much bugs adhering to their specific banner board. Another factor might be that the gathering who was responsible for the purple banner board needed to shading a plain white piece. Implying that the board may not be totally purple, and the bugs might be pulled in to the white spots appearing through the shaded board.

The History of the Thematic Analysis Psychology Essay

The History of the Thematic Analysis Psychology Essay Thematic analysis is an analytical technique serving to interpret the contents of texts or human experiences and widely used in qualitative research. In its interpretation of qualitative data, thematic analysis generates themes within the distinguished categories of data. Each category that reflects a recurring feature of the obtained data attributes a code to a corresponding informational block. However, data categorization is thematic analysis pursues the aim of managing the overall volume of unstructured data rather than indicating conceptual issues. In this vein, thematic analysis entails a clear and precise definition of codes that are distinct from one another. During analytical procedures, a researcher refers to the developed code log book to categorize data and allow themes to emerge.[1] In other words, a theme in thematic analysis represents a statement of meaning observed in most of the data. This meaning may be also reported by a minority of participants, but carry a strong emotional power or factual impact on the studied situation. In thematic analysis, themes may be regarded as units formed by deriving and comprising patterns of conversation issues, meanings, feelings, recurring activities. Proverbs, and vocabulary. As such, themes serve to bring together elements ideas, perceptions, or experiences that may seem meaningless when considered separately.[2] In other words, the role of thematic analysis is to summarize the data content and draw relationships between distinct codes to produce a social meaning shared by the examined population sample. Therefore, thematic analysis is an interpretive analytical technique dedicated to revealing new concepts and ideas. Thematic analysis is theoretically flexible and allows answering various research questions without adherence to a specific framework. This analytical approach is mostly beneficial for responding to research questions regarding human experiences, ideas, attitudes, and perceptions.[3] Its focus on motifs and beliefs driving individual behavior fits scholar ship in psychology, social studies, behavioral research, and more applied disciplines like education, health, and clinical research. Psychology is a discipline that seeks to explore and analyze human experiences and behaviors to determine factors and personality traits shaping individual’s behavior patterns. In this vein, qualitative studies represent a significant portion of psychology scholarship when researchers attribute meanings to different behavior types observed or discussed with human participants.[4] In line with the prevailing qualitative research design, psychological studies focus on synthesizing the attained data and interpreting results into meaningful conclusions. In this pursuit, scholars tend to use different names to describe content analysis procedures utilized in their inquiries or using them without a specific description. Regardless of the expressed position, psychologists appreciate the thematic analysis framework for several benefits offered. While examining human observations, feelings, and attitudes, this analytical approach tends to bridge the researcher and participants intellectuall y and emotionally, fostering understanding of the former of motifs and beliefs underpinning behavior of the latter.[5] Moreover, thematic analysis allows combining different research methods that is a substantial advantage for psychological research. For instance, thematic analysis is applicable to processing and interpreting data obtained through both qualitative and quantitative methods. In thematic analysis, interview findings may be complemented by survey results to expand the depth and breadth of the acquired understanding while strengthening validity and reliability of the produced conclusions.[6] This argument is crucial in terms of qualitative research criticism that stresses on high subjectivity and descriptiveness of qualitative research findings. When applied to a single research method, thematic analysis serves to organize the unstructured dataset and embed a systematic approach in the analytical process. In the case of psychological research utilizing several research methods, thematic analysis is useful to generate an insight into the studied phenomenon while proving credibility of the attributed meaning. References Boyatzis, Richard E. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage, 1998. Gibson, Will. “Qualitative Research Analysis in Education.” In Educational Research and Inquiry: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, ed. Dimitra Hartas, 295-307. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2010. Goodwin, C. James and Kerri A. Goodwin. Research in Psychology: Methods and Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley Sons, 2016. Thatchenkery, Tojo and Carol Metzker. Appreciative Intelligence: Seeing the Mighty Oak in the Acorn. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 2006. [1] Ibid. [2] Tojo Thatchenkery and Carol Metzker, Appreciative Intelligence: Seeing the Mighty Oak in the Acorn (San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 2006), 235. [3] Ibid. [4] C. James Goodwin and Kerri A. Goodwin, Research in Psychology: Methods and Design (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley Sons, 2016), 302. [5] Richard E. Boyatzis, Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (Thousand oaks, CA: Sage, 1998), 6. [6] Goodwin and Goodwin, 302.